Submission Chain Advanced difficulty

What is Craig Jones Triangle to Leg Lock System?

The Craig Jones Triangle to Leg Lock System is a BJJGraph study guide for connecting upper-body submission threats with controlled leg-entanglement opportunities.

Systematic Submission Dilemmas is a focused instructional companion for studying triangles alongside leg attacks. Craig Jones’s published syllabus includes transitions between these families and commentary on grappling exchanges. This guide concentrates on choosing a branch rather than treating every defended triangle as an automatic leg entry.

The practice sequence is BJJGraph’s own study plan, not an official course syllabus. It assumes familiarity with the starting positions and access to coaching for the actual techniques. Begin with one triangle situation and one leg-control destination. If the required connection disappears, retaining guard or resetting may be the more useful decision. The goal is a better explanation of the exchange, not a promise that either submission must succeed.

Study this system with BJJ Fanatics

Explore a relevant instructional alongside this guide. Check the syllabus and sample on BJJ Fanatics to decide whether it suits your training.

BJJGraph earns a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you. It never changes what the graph teaches.

Systematic Submission Dilemmas: High Level Triangle and Leg Lock Combos

with Craig Jones

Who it suits: Experienced no-gi students who already practise triangles and leg control with a coach; the course includes advanced leg attacks.

Connects triangle attacks with lower-body entanglements rather than treating each submission as an isolated finish.

View course & syllabus on BJJ Fanatics

Core Principles

  • Identify the defensive reaction before deciding whether to change attacks.
  • Keep a positional fallback when neither submission branch is supported.
  • Treat reaching an entanglement and finishing a submission as separate skills.
  • Use a small set of familiar positions before adding more variations.
  • Agree permitted submissions and reset signals before the round.
  • Evaluate the quality of a decision independently from whether it produced a tap.

Key Components

Starting triangle situation (Give the decision exercise a familiar upper-body starting point.) Select a triangle entry or control that both partners already understand and can practise without rushing the finish.

Reaction identification (Make the reason for switching visible to both partners.) Ask the defender to show an agreed response and have the attacker describe what remains controlled.

Leg-control destination (Separate an entry decision from submission finishing pressure.) Choose a single leg entanglement with a coach and identify the requirements for reaching it without an uncontrolled scramble.

Fallback position (Keep an unsuccessful branch from becoming a forced attack.) Name a guard or other position to recover when the intended entry no longer has adequate control.

Exchange review (Build a usable decision map from observed rounds.) Record the reaction, selected branch and resulting position after each short practice sequence.

Implementation Sequence

  1. Set the boundaries: Agree which leg attacks are permitted in this session, a comfortable starting position and an immediate reset signal.

  2. Rehearse the starting control: Practise the triangle situation cooperatively. Use a coach’s feedback to resolve uncertainty before adding a transition.

  3. Identify one response: Let the defender give one agreed reaction. Pause and describe whether the original control remains useful.

  4. Select the branch: Choose between maintaining the current position, moving toward the selected leg control, or recovering guard. Avoid forcing a preset chain.

  5. Confirm the destination: End the repetition at a stable position, with no finishing pressure needed to count the entry. Reset if either partner is unsure.

  6. Vary and review: Add a second reaction, then compare the resulting decisions. Review the relevant course demonstration when the same control problem repeats.

Where to begin in the instructional

Compare the triangle-to-leg transitions in volume six with the commentary in volume eight.

BJJGraph earns a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you. It never changes what the graph teaches.

Explore the course contents on BJJ Fanatics: Systematic Submission Dilemmas: High Level Triangle and Leg Lock Combos →

What Challenges Will You Face?

  • The attacker switches simply because a triangle did not finish.: Require a named defensive reaction and a clear destination before rehearsing the switch.
  • Every round ends in a scramble with no identifiable position.: Stop at the first lost connection and simplify the entry with coaching.
  • The pair cannot agree whether the leg entry succeeded.: Define the target control before starting and score the position without a submission finish.
  • The practitioner collects variations without retaining a reliable branch.: Keep one starting triangle and one destination until their decision requirements can be explained.
  • The course is assumed to cover every leg-to-back chain.: Use this guide for triangle-to-leg decisions and consult separate back-attack material for a different objective.

How to Measure Your Progress

Reaction recognition: Check whether the attacker can explain the response that prompted a change. Proficiency indicators:

  • Names an observed reaction
  • Distinguishes a reaction from a lost grip
  • Can explain why staying put was also an option

Destination clarity: Evaluate whether both partners recognise the end of the entry drill. Proficiency indicators:

  • Names the intended position
  • Stops at stable control without finishing pressure
  • Resets when the destination is not achieved

Fallback selection: Review what happens when neither attacking branch remains available. Proficiency indicators:

  • Can identify a guard-recovery option
  • Does not chase a loose limb through a scramble
  • Can describe the next study problem

Practice consistency: Assess whether the drill stays within the pair’s agreed scope. Proficiency indicators:

  • Uses agreed submissions only
  • Responds immediately to stop signals
  • Separates technical uncertainty from resistance

How to Train This System Effectively

Drilling Approach

This is BJJGraph’s suggested decision drill. Use cooperative repetitions with a coach-approved triangle situation and one leg-control destination. Pause after the defensive reaction, name the available choices and end the repetition at the selected position. Keep finishing pressure out of the entry drill. Add resistance only when both partners recognise the transitions and the reset conditions.

Progression Path

Orient (Focus: Choose a familiar starting triangle and review the permitted techniques with a coach.) Recognise (Focus: Identify one defensive response without attempting to win the exchange.) Connect (Focus: Rehearse one entry and one fallback with clear stopping points.) Decide (Focus: Allow another agreed reaction and compare the branch selected in each case.)

Common Mistakes

  • Assuming every defended triangle exposes a leg attack.
  • Adding several unfamiliar entanglements to a single drill.
  • Judging an entry only by whether a submission follows.

Take one idea into your next session

BJJGraph suggestion: pause after a defensive reaction, name the available control position, then reset if neither branch is secure. Agree allowed leg attacks beforehand.

BJJGraph earns a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you. It never changes what the graph teaches.

Check the sample and current price on BJJ Fanatics: Systematic Submission Dilemmas: High Level Triangle and Leg Lock Combos →