BJJ Graph

Spider Guard

Jun 15, 20258 min read

Spider Guard

bjjstateguardopen_guardbottomspider

Required Properties for State Machine

Core Identifiers

  • State ID: S011
  • Position Name: Spider Guard
  • Alternative Names: Aranha Guard, Spider Web Guard, Sleeve and Foot Guard

State Properties

  • Point Value: 0 points (IBJJF scoring system)
  • Position Type: Offensive - categorizes strategic role
  • Risk Level: Medium - vulnerability assessment
  • Energy Cost: High - physical demand to maintain position
  • Time Sustainability: Medium - how long position can be held

Success Probability Data

  • Position Retention Rate: Beginner 45%, Intermediate 65%, Advanced 80%
  • Advancement Probability: 40% chance to improve position
  • Submission Probability: 25% direct submission threat from this position
  • Position Loss Probability: 35% chance opponent escapes/reverses

State Machine Content Elements

Visual Description

Must include detailed physical positioning that enables clear spatial understanding and visualization:

You are on your back with both feet placed on your opponent’s biceps, controlling their sleeves with your hands. Your opponent is kneeling or standing in your open guard, with their arms extended and controlled. Your legs create tension by pushing their arms wide while your grips prevent them from breaking free. Your hips are elevated slightly off the ground, creating a spring-like tension throughout your body that allows for dynamic movement and attacks.

Template: “You lie on your back with feet on opponent’s biceps, gripping their sleeves. Your opponent kneels with arms extended and controlled. Tension created through arm extension and leg pressure. Dynamic positioning allows for sweeps and transitions.”

Defensive Responses (Available Counter-Actions)

When opponent has this position:

  • Sleeve Break: Breaking grip connections to neutralize control → Open Guard Top (Success Rate: 60%)
  • Stack Pressure: Driving forward to collapse guard structure → Guard Pass (Success Rate: 45%)
  • Knee Cut Pass: Circling around extended legs → Knee Cut Position (Success Rate: 40%)
  • Backward Step: Creating distance to reset grips → Standing Guard (Success Rate: 55%)

Format: [[Technique Name]] → [[Resulting State]] (Success Rate: X%)

Offensive Transitions (Available Actions)

From this position:

  • Omoplata Sweep: Using sleeve control to off-balance → Omoplata Control (Success Rate: Beginner 35%, Intermediate 55%, Advanced 70%)
  • Tripod Sweep: Leveraging opponent forward with foot placement → Top Position (Success Rate: Beginner 40%, Intermediate 60%, Advanced 75%)
  • Triangle Setup: Bringing leg over for triangle entry → Triangle Control (Success Rate: Beginner 25%, Intermediate 45%, Advanced 65%)
  • Lasso Transition: Converting to lasso guard control → Lasso Guard (Success Rate: Beginner 50%, Intermediate 70%, Advanced 85%)
  • Spider X Sweep: Using cross-sleeve grip for directional sweep → Top Position (Success Rate: Beginner 30%, Intermediate 50%, Advanced 70%)
  • Bicep Slicer: Applying pressure to extended arm → Bicep Slicer (Success Rate: Beginner 15%, Intermediate 30%, Advanced 50%)

Format: [[Technique Name]] → [[Resulting State]] (Success Rate: Beginner X%, Intermediate Y%, Advanced Z%)

Decision Tree Logic

Structured decision-making logic:

If [opponent attempts to stack]:
- Execute [[Omoplata Sweep]] → [[Omoplata Control]] (Probability: 70%)

Else if [opponent postures high]:
- Execute [[Tripod Sweep]] → [[Top Position]] (Probability: 65%)

Else if [opponent leans forward]:
- Execute [[Triangle Setup]] → [[Triangle Control]] (Probability: 55%)

Else [opponent maintains distance]:
- Execute [[Lasso Transition]] → [[Lasso Guard]] (Probability: 75%)

Educational & Commentary Content

Expert Insights

Commentary as if from recognized authorities for authentic technical analysis:

  • John Danaher: “Spider guard succeeds through systematic control of distance and angle. The key is maintaining constant tension on the sleeves while using foot placement to manipulate your opponent’s balance. The position creates a mechanical disadvantage for the opponent that can be exploited through precise timing and direction changes.”
  • Gordon Ryan: “In competition, spider guard works best as a transition position rather than a holding pattern. I use it to set up specific sweeps and submissions, particularly the omoplata and triangle combinations. The energy cost is high, so efficiency in attacks is crucial for success.”
  • Eddie Bravo: “Spider guard integrates well with rubber guard concepts, particularly when transitioning to high guard positions. The sleeve control creates opportunities for creative attacks and can be combined with lapel work in gi competition for devastating effect.”

Each insight should be 2-3 sentences providing specific technical or strategic guidance.

Common Errors

For technical understanding and education:

  • Error Description: Gripping too close to the wrists instead of deep sleeve grips

  • Consequence: Opponent can easily break grips and pass guard

  • Correction: Secure deep sleeve grips near the elbows for maximum control

  • Error Description: Placing feet too high on the arms near shoulders

  • Consequence: Reduces sweep leverage and makes position unstable

  • Correction: Position feet on biceps for optimal control and sweep mechanics

  • Error Description: Failing to maintain constant tension on the sleeves

  • Consequence: Allows opponent to recover posture and initiate passing

  • Correction: Keep arms extended and create spring-like tension throughout position

  • Error Description: Staying static instead of constantly attacking

  • Consequence: High energy cost without offensive progress

  • Correction: Flow between attacks and use position as transition hub

  • Error Description: Neglecting hip mobility and staying flat

  • Consequence: Reduces effectiveness of sweeps and submissions

  • Correction: Stay mobile with hips elevated and ready to adjust angles

Key Principles

3-5 fundamental concepts that govern success in this position:

  • Constant sleeve tension creates control and prevents opponent’s advance
  • Foot placement on biceps provides leverage for sweeps and balance breaking
  • Dynamic movement between attacks maintains offensive initiative
  • Distance management through leg extension controls opponent’s pressure
  • Grip fighting determines position retention and attack opportunities

Prerequisites

Skills/positions that should be mastered before attempting this position:

  • Basic open guard concepts and hip mobility
  • Sleeve grip fighting and grip retention skills
  • Understanding of basic sweep mechanics and timing
  • Flexibility in hips and shoulders for position maintenance
  • Foundational knowledge of guard retention principles

State Machine Integration Elements

State Invariants

Conditions that must remain true for this position to be maintained:

  • Both sleeve grips must be secured with deep, strong connections
  • At least one foot must be in contact with opponent’s bicep or arm
  • Opponent must be in kneeling or standing posture within guard
  • Tension must be maintained through extended arms and leg pressure

Timing Considerations

When this position is most/least effective:

  • Most effective when opponent is attempting to establish grips or pressure
  • Less effective against opponents with superior grip fighting skills
  • Optimal during transition moments when opponent is adjusting position
  • Vulnerable when energy levels are low due to high metabolic demand

Training Scenarios

Practice situations for skill development:

  • Grip fighting drills with progressive resistance
  • Sweep timing exercises with movement patterns
  • Flow sequences connecting to other guard positions
  • Energy management training for position sustainability
  • Partner reaction drilling for attack recognition

Documentation Elements

Descriptive Language

Rich, detailed descriptions for comprehensive documentation:

  • Extension verbs that convey stretching and tension dynamics
  • Control descriptors emphasizing grip and leverage management
  • Balance descriptors showing opponent manipulation and sweep mechanics
  • Dynamic language expressing fluid movement and position transitions

Coaching Cues

Short, memorable phrases for instruction:

  • Technical reminders (“Deep sleeve grips, feet on biceps”)
  • Strategic guidance (“Control distance, attack when they move”)
  • Motivational elements (“Stay active, make them work”)
  • Timing cues (“Sweep when they lean, submit when they stack”)

Validation Checklist

Every position file must include:

  • All required properties with specific values
  • Detailed visual description (minimum 3 sentences)
  • At least 3 defensive responses with success rates
  • At least 3 offensive transitions with success rates
  • Decision tree with minimum 3 branching conditions
  • Expert insights from all three authorities
  • Minimum 5 common errors with corrections
  • Clear state invariants
  • Training drill suggestions

Example Implementation

See Mount for a complete example implementing all standard requirements.

Notes for Developers

This standard ensures:

  • Consistent data structure for state machine implementation
  • Probability data for statistical analysis and calculations
  • Rich content for comprehensive technical documentation
  • Educational value through expert insights and error correction
  • Visual description quality for clear understanding
  • Structured decision logic for systematic analysis

Updates to this standard should be reflected across all position files to maintain consistency and completeness.

Decision Tree

If opponent attempts stack pressure:

Else if opponent maintains high posture:

Else if opponent leans forward significantly:

Else (opponent maintains defensive distance):

Position Metrics

  • Success Rate: 65% retention/advance (competition data)
  • Average Time in Position: 45-90 seconds
  • Sweep Probability: 55%
  • Submission Probability: 25%
  • Energy Efficiency: Low (high metabolic cost)

Optimal Paths

The highest-percentage offensive path from this position: Spider Guard → Omoplata Sweep → Omoplata Control → Omoplata → Won by Submission

Alternative high-percentage path: Spider Guard → Tripod Sweep → Top Position → Side Control → Mount → Won by Submission

Computer Science Analogy

Spider guard functions as a “load balancer” in the BJJ state machine, distributing pressure across multiple control points (sleeves and biceps) to prevent any single defensive action from succeeding, while maintaining multiple concurrent attack threads.

Graph View

Backlinks