BJJ Graph

Knee Tap

Jun 15, 20259 min read

Knee Tap

bjjtransitiontakedownwrestlingstanding

Required Properties for State Machine

Core Identifiers

  • Transition ID: T050
  • Transition Name: Knee Tap
  • Alternative Names: Knee Pick, Single Knee Attack, Low Level Takedown

State Machine Properties

Transition Properties

  • Success Probability: Beginner 35%, Intermediate 60%, Advanced 80% - core probability data
  • Execution Complexity: Medium - technical difficulty assessment
  • Energy Cost: Medium - physical demand of execution
  • Time Required: Quick - duration of transition
  • Risk Level: Medium - chance of backfire or position loss

Physical Requirements

  • Strength Requirements: Medium for grip control and driving motion
  • Flexibility Requirements: High for low level changes and knee reach
  • Coordination Requirements: High for technical precision and timing
  • Speed Requirements: High for timing-dependent execution

State Machine Content Elements

Visual Execution Sequence

Detailed step-by-step description for clear movement sequence visualization:

From standing position with collar tie or underhook control, you drop your level significantly by stepping deep and lowering your body while maintaining upper body contact. Your opponent typically maintains their stance or attempts to counter-grip. You then reach across with your outside hand to grab behind their near knee while simultaneously driving forward with your shoulder and upper body. The combination of knee control and forward drive disrupts their base completely, causing them to fall backward as you follow through, landing in a dominant top position with control established.

Template: “From standing with upper body control, you drop level dramatically and grab behind their knee while driving forward. Your opponent’s base is completely disrupted as you follow through to top position.”

Execution Steps (Numbered Sequence)

  1. Setup Requirements: Establish collar tie or underhook from standing position
  2. Initial Movement: Drop level significantly by stepping deep and lowering body
  3. Opponent Response: Opponent typically tries to sprawl or maintain balance
  4. Adaptation: Adjust timing and angle based on their defensive reaction
  5. Completion: Grab behind knee with outside hand while driving forward
  6. Consolidation: Follow through to secure top position control

Key Technical Details

Critical elements that determine success:

  • Grip Requirements: Strong collar tie or underhook for upper body control
  • Base/Foundation: Dramatic level change with deep step for knee access
  • Timing Windows: Execute when opponent’s weight is on targeted leg
  • Leverage Points: Knee grab combined with upper body drive creates takedown
  • Common Adjustments: Vary knee grip and drive angle based on resistance

Success Modifiers

Factors that increase/decrease probability:

  • Setup Quality: Strong upper body control and proper positioning (+/-15%)
  • Timing Precision: Executing when opponent’s weight is committed (+/-20%)
  • Opponent Fatigue: Reduced defensive reactions and balance (+/-5%)
  • Knowledge Test Performance: Understanding takedown mechanics (+/-10%)
  • Position Control: Quality of initial grip establishment (+/-10%)

Counter-Attack Analysis

Common Counters

Opponent responses with success rates:

  • Sprawl Defense: Dropping hips back to avoid knee grab → Standing Position (Success Rate: 55%, Conditions: early recognition)
  • Whizzer Counter: Using overhook to counter and reverse → Top Position (Success Rate: 45%, Conditions: superior positioning)
  • Knee Shield: Using knee to prevent level change access → Clinch Position (Success Rate: 50%, Conditions: timing dependent)
  • Circle Away: Moving away from takedown angle → Standing Position (Success Rate: 40%, Conditions: mobility)

Format: [[Counter Technique]] → [[Result State]] (Success Rate: X%, Conditions: [when applicable])

Decision Logic

If [knee tap setup] is telegraphed early:
- Execute [[Sprawl Defense]] (Probability: 55%)

Else if [level change] is recognized:
- Execute [[Knee Shield]] (Probability: 50%)

Else if [takedown timing] can be reversed:
- Execute [[Whizzer Counter]] (Probability: 45%)

Else [optimal takedown execution]:
- Accept transition (Probability: Success Rate - Modifiers)

Educational Content

Expert Insights

Commentary as if from recognized authorities:

  • John Danaher: “The knee tap succeeds through precise level change and knee isolation rather than brute force. The key is understanding that the dramatic level change must be combined with proper upper body control to create an unstoppable takedown. The technique teaches fundamental principles of low-level attacks that apply throughout wrestling and BJJ.”
  • Gordon Ryan: “In no-gi competition, the knee tap is exceptional because it works well against taller opponents and doesn’t rely on traditional grip systems. I use it when opponents are defensive in standing exchanges, as the low-level attack creates immediate ground engagement where I can implement my ground advantages. The element of surprise makes it highly effective.”
  • Eddie Bravo: “The knee tap integrates perfectly with other takedown attempts and can be modified for different grip configurations. When the takedown is partially defended, it often creates scramble situations that favor creative grapplers. The technique demonstrates how wrestling fundamentals can be adapted for modern grappling scenarios.”

Each insight should focus on one key technical or strategic element.

Common Errors

For knowledge test generation:

  • Error: Attempting knee tap without proper level change

  • Why It Fails: Insufficient angle and access to effectively grab knee

  • Correction: Always drop level dramatically before reaching for knee

  • Recognition: Feeling unable to reach or control opponent’s knee

  • Error: Poor upper body control during takedown execution

  • Why It Fails: Lack of control allows opponent to defend and counter

  • Correction: Maintain strong collar tie or underhook throughout motion

  • Recognition: Opponent easily maintains balance despite knee control

  • Error: Not driving forward after establishing knee control

  • Why It Fails: Knee control alone is insufficient to complete takedown

  • Correction: Combine knee grab with simultaneous forward drive

  • Recognition: Opponent maintains balance despite knee being controlled

Timing Considerations

When to attempt this transition:

  • Optimal Conditions: When opponent has weight committed to targeted leg
  • Avoid When: Opponent is mobile and constantly changing stance
  • Setup Sequences: After failed grip attempts that create defensive reactions
  • Follow-up Windows: Must complete within 2-3 seconds to prevent counter

Prerequisites

Requirements before attempting:

  • Technical Skills: Basic standing position control and grip fighting
  • Physical Preparation: Hip flexibility and coordination for level changes
  • Positional Understanding: Standing mechanics and takedown principles
  • Experience Level: Intermediate technique requiring timing and precision

Technical Assessment Elements

Knowledge Assessment Questions

5 technical questions with multiple choice answers:

  • Mechanical Understanding: “What creates the takedown force in the knee tap?”
  • Timing Recognition: “When is the optimal moment to execute the level change?”
  • Error Prevention: “What is the most common setup mistake?”
  • Setup Requirements: “Which upper body control is essential for execution?”
  • Adaptation: “How do you adjust if opponent sprawls during attempt?”

Variants and Adaptations

Different versions for various scenarios:

  • Gi Specific: Traditional collar and sleeve grips for maximum control
  • No-Gi Specific: Underhook and collar tie adaptations
  • Self-Defense: Modified version for clothing grips in street situations
  • Competition: Combination with other takedowns for scoring opportunities
  • Size Differential: Effective for shorter practitioners against taller opponents

Training Progressions

Skill development pathway:

  • Solo Practice: Level change and knee reach motion without partner
  • Cooperative Drilling: Partner allows takedown completion for timing development
  • Resistant Practice: Partner provides progressive defensive resistance
  • Sparring Integration: Implementing takedown during live standing exchanges
  • Troubleshooting: Identifying and correcting execution problems

Audio & Narration Elements

Action Descriptions

Dynamic language for TTS narration:

  • Movement Verbs: Drop, reach, grab, drive, penetrate, follow-through
  • Spatial References: Level change, knee isolation, forward drive
  • Pressure Dynamics: Upper body pressure, knee control, momentum transfer
  • Momentum Descriptions: Explosive level change, driving finish

Coaching Commentary

Real-time instruction and feedback:

  • Setup Cues: “Get that upper body control first”
  • Execution Guidance: “Drop level and grab that knee”
  • Adaptation Prompts: “Feel their weight and time your attack”
  • Completion Confirmation: “Drive forward and secure top position”

Technical Specifications

Animation Keyframes

For potential visual development:

  • Starting Position: Standing with collar tie or underhook established
  • Transition Points: Level change, knee grab, forward drive
  • Ending Position: Top position with opponent taken down
  • Alternative Outcomes: Failed takedown leading to continued standing exchange

Biomechanical Analysis

Scientific movement breakdown:

  • Force Vectors: Downward level change combined with lateral knee control
  • Leverage Ratios: Upper body control multiplied by knee isolation
  • Range of Motion: Hip flexion for level change, arm extension for reach
  • Power Generation: Hip drive, core stability, and grip strength coordination

Validation Checklist

Every transition file must include:

  • All required properties with specific numeric values
  • Detailed visual execution sequence (minimum 4 sentences)
  • Complete numbered execution steps (minimum 6 steps)
  • At least 3 common counters with success rates
  • Decision logic for opponent behavior
  • Expert insights from all three authorities
  • Minimum 3 common errors with corrections
  • 5 knowledge test questions with answers
  • Timing considerations and prerequisites
  • Training progression pathway

Example Implementation

See Bridge and Roll for a complete example implementing all standard requirements.

Notes for Developers

This standard ensures:

  • Consistent transition data for state machine implementation
  • Probability calculations with modifier systems
  • Rich content for comprehensive technical documentation
  • Educational value through expert analysis
  • Technical depth for authentic understanding
  • Structured decision analysis patterns
  • Knowledge assessment integration
  • Training progression guidance

Updates to this standard should be reflected across all transition files to maintain consistency and educational value.

  • Ankle Pick - Similar low-level takedown with different target
  • Single Leg Takedown - Alternative wrestling takedown
  • Double Leg Takedown - Two-leg variation of takedown
  • Osoto Gari - Judo alternative with different mechanics
  • High Crotch - High-level wrestling takedown alternative

Competition Applications

  • IBJJF Rules: Legal at all belt levels, scores as takedown (2 points)
  • No-Gi Competition: Highly effective due to lack of grip dependency
  • Self-Defense: Excellent for creating distance and gaining dominance
  • MMA Applications: Modified version useful in mixed martial arts

Historical Context

The knee tap is a fundamental wrestling technique that has been adapted for Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and mixed martial arts. It demonstrates the principle of using dramatic level changes and precise targeting to overcome size and strength advantages.

Safety Considerations

  • Controlled Application: Smooth execution prevents injury to both practitioners
  • Mat Awareness: Ensure adequate space for safe completion
  • Partner Safety: Controlled follow-through protects training partner
  • Landing Control: Maintain connection to control opponent’s fall

Position Integration

Common knee tap combinations:

Training Applications

  • Wrestling Integration: Essential technique for BJJ practitioners learning takedowns
  • Competition Preparation: Low-risk takedown option for point scoring
  • Flow Training: Integrates well with other standing techniques
  • Level Change Training: Excellent for developing dramatic level changes

Graph View

Backlinks