The Saddle position, also known as the Honey Hole in some schools, represents one of the most dominant and dangerous leg entanglement positions in modern Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. This configuration involves controlling your opponent’s leg while sitting perpendicular to their body, with your legs forming a figure-four or similar entanglement around their targeted leg. The position offers unparalleled control over the hip, knee, and ankle joints simultaneously, creating multiple submission pathways primarily focused on heel hooks but also including straight ankle locks, toe holds, and kneebars.
Historically, the Saddle was considered an advanced no-gi position, popularized through submission grappling and MMA before gaining acceptance in certain gi competition formats. Its effectiveness in neutralizing larger, stronger opponents through mechanical advantage has made it a cornerstone of modern leg lock systems. The position’s power lies in its ability to isolate one leg while preventing the opponent from effectively defending or escaping, creating what practitioners call a “check mate” scenario where every defensive movement opens new attacking opportunities.
The Saddle functions as both a controlling position and a submission platform. Unlike positions such as mount or back control where the goal is positional dominance with submission as a secondary objective, the Saddle inverts this hierarchy—it exists primarily to finish the match through submission, with positional control serving that ultimate goal. This makes it particularly relevant in submission-only formats and no-gi competitions where leg locks are legal, though practitioners must understand ruleset restrictions in IBJJF and similar organizations.
From a strategic perspective, the Saddle represents the culmination of systematic leg entanglement progression. Practitioners typically enter this position from Outside Ashi-Garami, Inside Ashi-Garami, Single Leg X-Guard, or 50-50 Guard through specific technical transitions. Each entry pathway requires precise timing, angle creation, and understanding of weight distribution to achieve the ideal configuration. Once established, the position offers remarkable sustainability against resistance, as the opponent’s natural defensive reactions often tighten the entanglement rather than create escape opportunities.
The modern Saddle game emphasizes control before submission, contrary to earlier approaches that prioritized immediate attacking. Contemporary methodology, particularly as systematized by high-level instructors, focuses on achieving what’s called “positional dominance”—a configuration where all of the opponent’s escape attempts have been addressed through superior positioning, grip placement, and angle management. Only after establishing this level of control do practitioners transition to finishing mechanics. This approach dramatically increases submission success rates while reducing the risk of losing position during the attacking sequence.
Understanding the Saddle requires knowledge of both the offensive and defensive perspectives. From bottom, practitioners must recognize the catastrophic danger of this position and employ systematic escape protocols that prioritize protecting the heel, clearing the hip line, and creating space for leg extraction. From top, practitioners must understand the nuanced details that separate a loose leg entanglement from a dominant Saddle—factors including hip pressure, shoulder positioning, grip selection, and maintaining perpendicular alignment to the opponent’s body.
Key Principles
-
Hip pressure controls opponent’s ability to turn into or away from the entanglement
-
Perpendicular alignment to opponent’s body maximizes mechanical advantage on the leg
-
Inside position (between opponent’s legs) is critical for maintaining the entanglement
-
Control the heel before attacking—position precedes submission
-
Opponent’s defensive movements should tighten the position, not create escape opportunities
-
Systematic entries from ashi garami variations create highest success rates
-
Understanding ruleset restrictions is mandatory before training saddle mechanics
Top vs Bottom
| Bottom | Top | |
|---|---|---|
| Position Type | Defensive | Offensive/Controlling |
| Risk Level | High | Medium |
| Energy Cost | High | Medium |
| Time | Short | Medium |
Key Difference: Perpendicular entanglement submission dilemma
Playing as Bottom
Key Principles
-
Protect the heel above all else—any heel exposure dramatically increases submission probability
-
Never explosively pull the leg away—creates kinetic energy that magnifies joint damage
-
Clear opponent’s hip pressure before attempting leg extraction
-
Use free leg to control opponent’s hips and prevent them from squaring up to your trapped leg
-
Maintain connection to opponent’s body to prevent space creation for finishing mechanics
-
Address grips systematically before making larger positional adjustments
Primary Techniques
-
Ashi Garami Escape → Inside Ashi-Garami
- Success Rate: Beginner 15%, Intermediate 30%, Advanced 50%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 10%, Intermediate 25%, Advanced 45%
-
Technical Standup → Standing Position
- Success Rate: Beginner 5%, Intermediate 15%, Advanced 35%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 12%, Intermediate 28%, Advanced 48%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 8%, Intermediate 20%, Advanced 40%
-
Frame and Shrimp → Outside Ashi-Garami
- Success Rate: Beginner 18%, Intermediate 35%, Advanced 55%
Common Mistakes
-
❌ Explosively pulling trapped leg away from opponent when heel is controlled
- Consequence: Creates rotational force that damages knee ligaments and increases heel hook finishing mechanics
- ✅ Correction: Move your body toward opponent rather than pulling leg away, reducing joint stress while creating angles for escape
-
❌ Attempting to turn into opponent when they have inside position
- Consequence: Tightens the entanglement and exposes heel more directly to finishing position
- ✅ Correction: First clear opponent’s hip control and establish frames before attempting any rotational movement
-
❌ Ignoring grip fighting and focusing only on leg extraction
- Consequence: Opponent reestablishes control immediately when you create any space
- ✅ Correction: Systematically address grips before attempting large positional changes—control precedes movement
-
❌ Using free leg to kick or push without strategic purpose
- Consequence: Wastes energy and potentially assists opponent in tightening their control
- ✅ Correction: Free leg should frame on opponent’s hips to prevent them from squaring up to trapped leg
-
❌ Waiting too long to tap when submission is locked
- Consequence: Severe knee and ankle injuries that can end careers
- ✅ Correction: Tap early when escape is no longer technically possible—training partners are not worth permanent injury
Playing as Top
Key Principles
-
Perpendicular positioning creates maximum mechanical advantage on the leg
-
Hip pressure prevents opponent rotation and maintains positional dominance
-
Inside position is non-negotiable—losing it compromises entire control structure
-
Control before submission—establish optimal position before attempting finishes
-
Systematic entries have higher success rates than scramble-based opportunities
-
Opponent’s defensive reactions should tighten your control, not create escape opportunities
-
Grip sequencing matters—establish structural grips before finishing grips
Primary Techniques
-
Inside Heel Hook → Won by Submission
- Success Rate: Beginner 40%, Intermediate 60%, Advanced 80%
-
Outside Heel Hook → Won by Submission
- Success Rate: Beginner 35%, Intermediate 55%, Advanced 75%
-
Straight Ankle Lock → Won by Submission
- Success Rate: Beginner 30%, Intermediate 50%, Advanced 70%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 25%, Intermediate 45%, Advanced 65%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 28%, Intermediate 48%, Advanced 68%
-
Back Take Generic → Back Control
- Success Rate: Beginner 20%, Intermediate 35%, Advanced 55%
-
Position Change → Inside Ashi-Garami
- Success Rate: Beginner 45%, Intermediate 65%, Advanced 85%
-
Back Step → Outside Ashi-Garami
- Success Rate: Beginner 35%, Intermediate 55%, Advanced 75%
Common Mistakes
-
❌ Attempting to finish heel hook before establishing optimal control position
- Consequence: Opponent escapes by creating space or rotating away during your attack
- ✅ Correction: Follow systematic hierarchy: perpendicular alignment → hip pressure → inside position → grip establishment → clearing frames → finish
-
❌ Losing inside position by allowing opponent to turn into you
- Consequence: Entire position collapses as opponent achieves bilateral leg entanglement or guard recovery
- ✅ Correction: Maintain hip pressure and use your top leg to block opponent’s hip rotation toward you
-
❌ Gripping the heel immediately without establishing structural control
- Consequence: Telegraphs your intention and allows opponent to defend heel preemptively
- ✅ Correction: Establish positional grips first (ankle, pants, belt) then transition to heel grip only when ready to finish
-
❌ Allowing space to develop between your body and opponent’s trapped leg
- Consequence: Opponent uses space to create frames, rotate their body, or extract their leg
- ✅ Correction: Maintain constant connection with chest-to-thigh pressure while keeping your shoulder heavy on their leg
-
❌ Using excessive force on submission attempts before control is optimized
- Consequence: Opponent escapes during your explosive effort or suffers injury from uncontrolled submission
- ✅ Correction: Apply submissions slowly and progressively, maintaining position throughout the finishing sequence