Mission Control is the foundational control position within Eddie Bravo’s rubber guard system, representing the critical transitional state between basic high guard and the offensive attacks that define 10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu. From the bottom of closed guard, Mission Control is achieved when the practitioner establishes a high guard with one leg controlling the opponent’s shoulder while maintaining strong grips on the opponent’s head and arm. This position is characterized by extreme hip elevation, shoulder isolation, and the ability to break down the opponent’s posture completely.
The strategic value of Mission Control lies in its dual function as both a control mechanism and an attack platform. Unlike traditional closed guard positions that focus primarily on sweeps and positional advancement, Mission Control is designed specifically to create submission opportunities through systematic shoulder isolation and neck exposure. The position forces the opponent into a severely compromised posture where their weight is loaded onto their trapped shoulder, making it extremely difficult to generate effective defensive movements or escape attempts.
What makes Mission Control particularly effective is the mechanical advantage created through leg positioning. By maintaining the high guard with the inside leg threaded across the opponent’s back and the outside leg controlling the far shoulder, the bottom practitioner creates a structural trap that becomes progressively tighter as the opponent attempts to defend. This positioning allows for multiple submission entries including triangle chokes, omoplatas, gogoplatas, and various arm attacks, all while maintaining strong positional control.
The energy dynamics of Mission Control favor the bottom practitioner significantly. While the position requires initial effort to establish and maintain the high guard, once locked in, the structural mechanics of the position force the top opponent to carry their own weight awkwardly on the trapped shoulder. This creates a ‘cooking’ effect where the top person fatigues rapidly while the bottom person can maintain control with relatively less energy expenditure. The psychological pressure of being trapped in such a compromised position often leads opponents to make defensive errors that open additional attack opportunities.
Mission Control serves as the central hub of the rubber guard system, connecting to numerous offensive variations and submission paths. Advanced practitioners use Mission Control as a platform to flow between New York, Carni, Invisible Collar, and other rubber guard controls, creating submission chains that force opponents into defensive dilemmas. The position’s effectiveness has been proven extensively in competition, particularly in no-gi grappling where the absence of gi grips makes traditional closed guard attacks more challenging. Understanding Mission Control is essential for any practitioner looking to develop a comprehensive bottom game that emphasizes submission hunting over positional advancement.
Key Principles
-
Mission Control requires extreme hip flexibility and active hip elevation to maintain control
-
The high guard position must be locked in tight against the opponent’s shoulder to prevent escape
-
Shoulder isolation is the primary control mechanism - break the opponent’s posture completely
-
The position is transitional, not static - constantly threaten submissions to prevent escape
-
Grip control on the head and arm creates the structural trap that makes submissions possible
-
Energy management favors the bottom - let the opponent’s weight work against them
-
Mission Control is a gateway position - use it to access more advanced rubber guard controls
Top vs Bottom
| Bottom | Top | |
|---|---|---|
| Position Type | Offensive/Controlling | Defensive |
| Risk Level | Medium | High |
| Energy Cost | Medium | High |
| Time | Medium to Long | Short |
Key Difference: High guard trades base for submission proximity
Playing as Bottom
Key Principles
-
Mission Control is fundamentally about shoulder isolation - if you cannot trap the shoulder, you do not have the position
-
Hip elevation is active, not passive - constantly drive hips up and forward to maintain control tension
-
The high guard leg is a lever, not just a hook - use it to amplify pulling pressure and shoulder isolation
-
Grip control on the head must be aggressive and unrelenting - any relaxation allows posture recovery
-
The position is designed for submissions, not stalling - constantly threaten attacks to prevent opponent from developing escape timing
-
Energy efficiency comes from structural position, not muscular effort - let the opponent’s weight work against them
-
Mission Control is a transitional hub - be ready to flow to New York, Carni, or submission controls based on opponent’s defensive responses
Primary Techniques
-
Triangle Setup → Triangle Control
- Success Rate: Beginner 35%, Intermediate 55%, Advanced 75%
-
Omoplata to Sweep → Omoplata Control
- Success Rate: Beginner 30%, Intermediate 50%, Advanced 70%
-
Transition to Omoplata → Omoplata Control
- Success Rate: Beginner 28%, Intermediate 48%, Advanced 68%
-
Triangle from Guard → Triangle Control
- Success Rate: Beginner 32%, Intermediate 52%, Advanced 72%
-
Armbar from Guard → Armbar Control
- Success Rate: Beginner 25%, Intermediate 42%, Advanced 62%
-
Transition to Truck → New York
- Success Rate: Beginner 20%, Intermediate 38%, Advanced 58%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 18%, Intermediate 32%, Advanced 50%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 22%, Intermediate 40%, Advanced 60%
-
Transition to Omoplata → Carni
- Success Rate: Beginner 15%, Intermediate 30%, Advanced 50%
-
Closed Guard to Triangle → Gogoplata Control
- Success Rate: Beginner 10%, Intermediate 22%, Advanced 40%
-
Triangle to Omoplata → Invisible Collar
- Success Rate: Beginner 12%, Intermediate 25%, Advanced 45%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 8%, Intermediate 18%, Advanced 35%
Common Mistakes
-
❌ Failing to maintain continuous hip elevation, allowing hips to settle to mat
- Consequence: Opponent can drive weight down and collapse the high guard position, escaping shoulder isolation
- ✅ Correction: Keep hips actively elevated throughout - use core engagement and leg drive to maintain upward pressure against opponent’s shoulder
-
❌ Relaxing grip pressure on opponent’s head during transitions or submission attempts
- Consequence: Opponent recovers posture immediately, eliminating shoulder isolation and submission opportunities
- ✅ Correction: Maintain aggressive downward pulling on head throughout all transitions - posture control is non-negotiable in Mission Control
-
❌ Positioning high guard leg too low on opponent’s back, reducing shoulder isolation effectiveness
- Consequence: Opponent maintains shoulder mobility and can generate defensive frames, preventing effective submission entries
- ✅ Correction: Thread leg as high as possible across opponent’s back - the higher the leg, the greater the shoulder isolation and control
-
❌ Allowing opponent’s trapped arm to slip outside of high guard leg during scrambles
- Consequence: Opponent can establish defensive frames and escape shoulder isolation, returning to neutral guard position
- ✅ Correction: Constantly monitor arm position - if arm begins to slip out, immediately transition to Invisible Collar or New York control
-
❌ Stalling in Mission Control without threatening submissions or transitions
- Consequence: Opponent develops timing for escape attempts and can methodically work to extract arm and break position
- ✅ Correction: Mission Control is an attack platform, not a resting position - constantly threaten triangle, omoplata, or transitions to keep opponent defensive
-
❌ Attempting to force submission entries before establishing proper shoulder isolation and posture control
- Consequence: Submissions fail due to lack of control foundation, opponent escapes during transition attempts
- ✅ Correction: Establish and confirm Mission Control structure first - shoulder isolated, posture broken, hips elevated - then attack with confidence
-
❌ Using only muscular strength to maintain position rather than leveraging structural mechanics
- Consequence: Rapid fatigue prevents sustained control, position collapses as practitioner tires before opponent does
- ✅ Correction: Rely on hip elevation and leg positioning for control - let structural mechanics do the work while minimizing muscular effort
Playing as Top
Key Principles
-
Do not panic or use explosive movements - Mission Control defense requires patience and systematic escape execution
-
Protect the neck first, extract the arm second - rushing arm extraction while ignoring triangle defense leads to submissions
-
Posture recovery must be gradual and progressive - sudden posturing attempts typically trigger immediate triangle entries
-
Weight distribution is critical - avoid loading weight onto trapped shoulder, but also avoid pulling weight back so far that you lose all forward pressure
-
The bottom practitioner’s hip elevation must be attacked - if their hips remain high, escape is nearly impossible
-
Grip fighting on the head is non-negotiable - if they achieve deep head control, submission entries become extremely difficult to defend
-
Mission Control defense is a war of attrition - extend the positional battle beyond the bottom practitioner’s sustainable timeframe
Primary Techniques
-
Posture Recovery → Closed Guard
- Success Rate: Beginner 20%, Intermediate 35%, Advanced 55%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 15%, Intermediate 28%, Advanced 45%
-
Stack Defense → Headquarters Position
- Success Rate: Beginner 18%, Intermediate 32%, Advanced 50%
-
Standing up in Base → Standing Guard
- Success Rate: Beginner 22%, Intermediate 38%, Advanced 58%
-
- Success Rate: Beginner 12%, Intermediate 25%, Advanced 42%
-
Guard Opening Sequence → Combat Base
- Success Rate: Beginner 10%, Intermediate 20%, Advanced 38%
Common Mistakes
-
❌ Panicking and using explosive movements to attempt immediate escape from Mission Control
- Consequence: Explosive movements create the momentum and angles that make triangle and omoplata entries easier for bottom practitioner, typically resulting in immediate submission
- ✅ Correction: Accept the temporary discomfort of the position and work systematically through escape phases - immediate defense, posture recovery, arm extraction - with patience and technical precision
-
❌ Attempting to pull trapped arm free before establishing proper head and posture positioning
- Consequence: Arm pulling movements expose the shoulder to omoplata entry and often create the angle necessary for bottom practitioner to complete triangle lock
- ✅ Correction: Focus on grip fighting the head control and recovering some posture before attempting arm extraction - the arm cannot be freed safely until posture provides structural support
-
❌ Loading too much weight onto the trapped shoulder in attempt to drive through the position
- Consequence: Weight on trapped shoulder is exactly what makes Mission Control effective for the bottom practitioner - it allows them to maintain control with less effort while you fatigue rapidly
- ✅ Correction: Distribute weight more evenly between both arms and maintain some backward weight distribution to reduce the mechanical advantage bottom practitioner gains from shoulder loading
-
❌ Allowing bottom practitioner to establish deep head control with both hands pulling the head down
- Consequence: Deep head control allows bottom practitioner to break posture completely, making all submission entries significantly easier and escape nearly impossible
- ✅ Correction: Use free hand constantly to fight grips on the head - strip grips, maintain distance, and prevent deep collar ties or head locks at all costs
-
❌ Attempting to posture up with sudden explosive extension of the spine and neck
- Consequence: Sudden posturing creates the exact movement pattern that allows bottom practitioner to complete triangle lock - your upward movement helps them get the leg across your face
- ✅ Correction: Posture recovery must be gradual and progressive - small improvements in angle and height over time, not explosive full extension attempts
-
❌ Neglecting to widen base and protect against sweeps while defending submissions
- Consequence: Bottom practitioner uses sweep threats when submission attacks are successfully defended, often getting mount or dominant position during defensive transitions
- ✅ Correction: Maintain wide base and good weight distribution throughout all defensive sequences - you’re defending both submissions and sweeps simultaneously
-
❌ Giving up mentally and accepting that submission is inevitable once Mission Control is established
- Consequence: Mental defeat leads to technical breakdown and failure to execute the defensive sequences that could lead to escape
- ✅ Correction: Understand that Mission Control is escapable with proper technique and patience - many submissions from the position fail because top person maintains composure and executes systematic defense